Previous Entry | Next Entry

None dare call it linkspam

  • Dec. 3rd, 2009 at 12:09 PM
crypto: Amy Pond (Default)
Okay, consider this a belated attempt to reverse the decline of my journal into an infrequently-updated tumblog. I'm not sure why I've become so reticent lately; I feel like I'm barely managing to leave a comment or two a week in other people's journals, though I compose dozens in my head.

In no particular order:

Gabriella Coleman on piracy as politics: "For those of us who believe in greater access and different ways of imagining structures and strategies of re-compensation, piracy on its own is not certainly enough and I understand fully and even to some degree, share the skepticism many feel toward such language. But I am not quite ready to declare a politics of piracy as always politically bankrupt or necessarily backward." An interesting supplement to Alexis Lothian's "Den of Thieves" argument viz. fandom, vidding, and piracy through the lens of Lim's "Us".

MightyGodKing on current Marvel/DC superhero comics: "[I]t’s worth reflecting upon how few Big Two books are good as opposed to merely being competent. For DC there’s Detective Comics, Batman and Robin, and Secret Six. For Marvel there’s Incredible Hercules, Invincible Iron Man, the “cosmic” books, and whatever comic fills the Iron Fist slot for any given month. That is it at present. (Daredevil’s new direction is uneven, Captain America is in a boring lull period, and Amazing Spider-Man is inconsistent on a week-to-week basis.) Eight books between the Big Two that are genuinely good comics and not just placefillers.... [he ETAs:] I forgot Fantastic Four, which belongs in the “good” category. Also: Ghost Rider. But that’s it." I agree -- the only comics I truly look forward to reading each month are all on his list (the three DC titles, plus Invincible Iron Man and Fantastic Four).

danah boyd on her experience giving a talk at Web 2.0 Expo: "I immediately knew that I had lost the audience. Rather than getting into flow and becoming an entertainer, I retreated into myself. I basically decided to read the entire speech instead of deliver it. I counted for the time when I could get off stage. I was reading aloud while thinking all sorts of terrible thoughts about myself and my failures. I wasn't even interested in my talk. All I wanted was to get it over with." This is basically my public speaking nightmare, except even worse thanks to the Twitter backchannel plus magnified by 100 due to venue, audience size, and sexism. I do several presentations a year, and I've gotten pretty comfortable doing them, but I still remember viscerally the handful of truly wretched experiences. My most surreal one was this spring, when I missed my flight due to a snowstorm and did my talk over the phone with no ability to gauge the audience's response as I was speaking. It was actually worse than the disembodied experience of doing a presentation on a teleconference, because at least with the latter the audience is equally dispersed and invisible to each other.

Skinny Jeans and Fruity Loops: The Networked Publics of Global Youth Culture -- a post about a recent talk by ethnomusicologist Wayne Marshall: "What can we learn about contemporary culture from watching dayglo-clad teenagers dancing geekily in front of their computers in such disparate sites as Brooklyn, Buenos Aires, Johannesburg, and Mexico City? How has the embrace of "new media" by so-called "digital natives" facilitated the formation of transnational, digital publics? More important, what are the local effects of such practices, and why do they seem to generate such hostile responses and anxiety about the future?" I haven't had a chance to listen to the audio yet, but he uses Jerking as one of his case studies! Count me in. Also, Marshall has a great blog.

I posted a vid for Bikini Kill's "Rebel Girl" the other day which I facetiously described as Maoist kitsch. But I was fascinated by the images in the clips, and set about tracking down the source. Turns out they're from The Red Detachment of Women, a Chinese ballet that was one of the eight model works during the Cultural Revolution. The full filmed version is available online here, or (in fifteen 6:46 minute chunks) starting here on YouTube. I've seen about a third of it so far, and it really is pretty stunning.

Tags:

Comments

princessofgeeks: Shane and Ilya looking at each other in the living room of the cottage (Default)
[personal profile] princessofgeeks wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 07:23 pm (UTC)
thanks for the link to boyd's blog. what a nightmare.
crypto: Amy Pond (Default)
[personal profile] crypto wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 07:37 pm (UTC)
Seriously. I think pretty much anyone who's done any kind of teaching or training or public speaking knows that sense of dread when you realize that you've lost your audience, but this sounds exponentially worse.
princessofgeeks: Shane and Ilya looking at each other in the living room of the cottage (Default)
[personal profile] princessofgeeks wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 08:34 pm (UTC)
it just sounds like a perfect storm -- she couldn't see the audience, she didn't dare look at the big screen of twitter behind her for fear of losing her place, and the audience sounds like it reached new lows of Behaving Badly. On top of the fact that she has public speaking anxiety in the first place -- GAH!

Encouraging an audience to NOT pay attention to a speaker is bad enough, but who thought of the idea of putting the Non Attention Scroll behind the speaker, thus encouraging and endorsing distraction? Crazy.
sara: S (Default)
[personal profile] sara wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 07:24 pm (UTC)
We were watching Sherman Alexie on Colbert last night (which was Hulu-delayed from the night before), and I thought he made some good points about the Kindle and book distribution, but at the same time he kept saying that people aren't building "local community" any more around their reading, and all I could think was, well, yes we are. We're just doing it in our own houses, where you can't see us because you don't choose to look.

Anyhow, might be worth a look. Like I say, I disagree with him about a lot of his points, but he's one of the few guests on the show who consistently gives Colbert a run for his money, and I do enjoy that.
crypto: Amy Pond (Default)
[personal profile] crypto wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 07:43 pm (UTC)
Thanks, I'll have to check that out. And I'm not sure what kind of local community he's mourning -- I've very occasionally bumped into someone I know at a bookstore, but it's not as though I've ever been in the habit of striking up conversations with random strangers there.

And thanks to Facebook, I now know more about what people around me are reading and what they think about it than I ever have! It used to be that I'd have a small subset of friends that I talked about, recommended, and shared books with, but social networking sites mean that pool has significantly expanded.

(I thought of you & Herself last night when I was watching the SYTYCD results show and one of the guest performers from a b-boy crew wore an I ♥ Jerking t-shirt.)
sara: wood cabinet with "Library No. 137" burned on it (library 137)
[personal profile] sara wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 07:53 pm (UTC)
Yeah, for years I mostly only talked with my mother and grandmother about what I was reading; in the last few years, the overwhelming majority of my book-buying decisions have been based on online recs or the familiarity I've developed with authors from reading their work online.

And frankly, given the current crap rates for selling short fiction? I'm not at all sure one isn't better off giving it away.

Hee, I should find her some more vids. We've been so caught up with Broken Foot Drama around here this week.
crypto: Amy Pond (Default)
[personal profile] crypto wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 07:56 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I can see how jerking & Broken Foot Drama would be incompatible. I see some of these videos, and I worry for their ankles!
sara: S (Default)
[personal profile] sara wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 08:04 pm (UTC)
Ooogh, yes, of all the things I don't want Mr. I Don't Need To Wear My Splint, Even Though I Can't Stand To Put Any Weight On My Foot Without It to be modeling his behavior on....;>
torachan: (Default)
[personal profile] torachan wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 10:50 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I certainly never talked about books with people offline other than my friends, and...now I talk online with my friends.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 07:47 pm (UTC)
Good, it's not just me about comics from the Big Two. I've had to cut way down anyway due to time and money constraints, and still get Detective and Streets from DC, but other than that, I get stuff from smaller pubs. I also get Previews every month to basically get a sense of everything else that's out there, and there's nothing else at Marvel or DC that does anything for me. And have you seen the sales figures for each lately? Ouch.

That said, there's some phenomenal stuff coming out now and in 2010 from Vertigo that I'm holding out for the TPBs for...
dkompare: (Default)
[personal profile] dkompare wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 07:47 pm (UTC)
Oops! That was me making that comment, crypto. I forgot to log in!
crypto: Amy Pond (Default)
[personal profile] crypto wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 07:54 pm (UTC)
I've only been looking at the Big Two superhero titles since I began dipping my toes back in the comics water this year, so I'm ready to broaden my horizons -- I have no idea what Vertigo's doing these days. But it's been pretty slim pickings, though the Rucka & Williams III Batwoman in Detective is outstanding, and Matt Fraction's been doing great stuff with Iron Man.
dkompare: (Default)
[personal profile] dkompare wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 07:59 pm (UTC)
Yeah, Rucka's Batwoman story alone is great, but coupled with Williams' mind-bending art, it's incredible.

I'm likely going to start going (way) back to some classic superhero material (i.e., 1960s silver age), particularly on the Marvel side, just to catch up on big chunks of the mythos that I'm not up to speed on, and take in some of the best writers and artists of the 60s-80s along the way.
crypto: Amy Pond (Default)
[personal profile] crypto wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 08:05 pm (UTC)
I've been seriously contemplating going back to the Lee/Ditko Spider-Man myself. The current incarnation (which, as MGK says, is erratic) has made me nostalgic for the few issues that I'd read as reprints.

Anything in particular you're interested in checking out?
dkompare: (Default)
[personal profile] dkompare wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 08:38 pm (UTC)
I've been teaching a comics course this semester, actually, and I had my students read the first few Lee/Ditko issues of Amazing Spider-Man, and that really stoked my interest. We did a run of a month or so where I had them read a classic story, a more contemporary take, and screen a film adaptation. We did Batman, Superman, Spider-Man, and Watchmen that way, and it worked great.

In addition, the critical work of Scott McCloud, Bradford Wright, and Douglas Wolk (while uneven) has turned me on to big names and vast swathes of comics history I'd never before seriously contemplated.

So anyway, for classic stuff, I'm probably most interested in checking out 1960s Marvel, followed by 1970s DC (especially O'Neill/Adams, and Kirby's trippy New Gods work), followed by the Claremont/Byrne run on X-Men (which I honestly haven't read yet!), and then some of the 1980s DC reboots (esp. Teen Titans and Superman).

The great thing is that they're legitimately available in multiple versions. For that reason, I don't mind the B&W "phonebook" Marvel Essentials at all: they're cheap, the writing and drawing are all there, and the color was pretty crap anyway back in the sixties! DC's "Showcase" series does similar work with their 1960s run.
crypto: Amy Pond (Default)
[personal profile] crypto wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 09:00 pm (UTC)
I read one of Marvel's phonebooks this summer for a '70s run of The Avengers by Steve Engelhart that I'd remembered fondly from the days when you had to scour for back issues. Unfortunately it didn't hold up that well, and the B&W version can sometimes be a drawback for team books with crowded panels.

I'd guess that some of Kirby's work might suffer in B&W -- the art itself would hold up, but he strikes me as someone who very much drew with a sense of a color end-product in a way that, say, Adams doesn't so much. But I'd love to go back and read through the Lee/Kirby Fantastic Four some day. And Kirby's New Gods & sister titles are well worth your time (including his run on Superman's Pal Jimmy Olsen).
sara: S (Default)
[personal profile] sara wrote:
Dec. 3rd, 2009 07:55 pm (UTC)
We used to drop $10-20 a week on comics, and now...nah.

I love the medium, but I'm so not excited about most of what's coming out right now.
rydra_wong: Lee Miller photo showing two women wearing metal fire masks in England during WWII. (Default)
[personal profile] rydra_wong wrote:
Dec. 4th, 2009 11:42 pm (UTC)
Dude. Thank you for the heads-up re: Red Detachment of Women -- I'm halfway through and wow. Completely fascinating.