Previous Entry | Next Entry

Oct. 6th, 2009

  • 1:53 PM
crypto: (sarah looks left)
So has anyone been trying out Google Wave? I don't have an invite, and after reading Robert Scoble's take, I'm not sure I want one. I can barely manage my inbox in its current form; I'd probably give up completely if it morphed into anything resembling Google 'email on steroids' Wave.

Am I failing at fall TV, or is fall TV failing me? So far I'm underwhelmed by FlashForward, bored by Fringe, and -- there should be a third show here, preferably one whose name starts with an 'F', but I don't think I'm even watching anything else. Not Supernatural, not Dollhouse, not Merlin, and certainly not Heroes.

Meanwhile the ill-conceived fall season of the U.S. version of So You Think You Can Dance appears to be stuck in an endless round of auditions, while the second season of its Canadian counterpart has been somewhat lackluster so far compared to last year. Hurry back, Australian version!

One bright spot: Kristin Cavallari has taken over from Lauren Conrad as the star of The Hills. Now, I have a soft spot for Kristin -- she was great on Laguna Beach, and reminds me of someone I went to high school with -- so it's nice to see her in action again, but the show feels hopelessly contrived now. Lauren was really the emotional center that grounded everything; Kristin's clearly not interested in playing that role, and nobody else can really fill the void that Lauren left. So I'm not sure how long I'll keep watching -- and seriously, who really wants to see Kristin and Audrina spend a season feuding over Justin Bobby?

But to my surprise, the NYC-based spin-off, The City, is actually looking promising. They dumped the boring characters, leaving only Whitney and Olivia Palermo from the original cast, and brought in work-and-friendship conflicts instead of the relationship focus of the first season. I gave up halfway through season 1, but I'm cautiously optimistic that the producers are not only aware of, but aggressively fixing what wasn't working. Also, last week's episode used one of the best songs from Amanda Blank's new album, which is vaguely impressive (or maybe I'm easy to impress).

Today's quote, courtesy of Tiger Beatdown: "Dear Joss Whedon, thank you for your interest in Feminism, but we cannot make any hiring decisions at this time."

Tags:

Comments

sara: S (Default)
[personal profile] sara wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2009 07:38 pm (UTC)
"Craft in America" starts up this week; I'm looking forward to that.
crypto: (sarah looks ahead)
[personal profile] crypto wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2009 07:49 pm (UTC)
*checks out website*

Hmm, that does look interesting (to a totally non-crafty person like me). And I could use some variation in my wrestling-and-reality-TV media diet.
sara: S (Default)
[personal profile] sara wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2009 08:22 pm (UTC)
There's a personal interest for us, this season -- the print I bought C. for his library school graduation, earlier this year, will be part of the second episode. We are excited.
crypto: Amy Pond (Default)
[personal profile] crypto wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2009 08:23 pm (UTC)
That is pretty cool.
sara: S (Default)
[personal profile] sara wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2009 08:29 pm (UTC)
I knew it was a good print, when I bought it, but I didn't think it was good in a "profiled on national TV" kind of way. *g*
dkompare: (Default)
[personal profile] dkompare wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2009 07:55 pm (UTC)
You lost me at "the show seems hopelessly contrived now."

Um.

NOW it seems hopelessly contrived?!?
crypto: (sarah looks ahead)
[personal profile] crypto wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2009 08:05 pm (UTC)
Dude, it's not about a hopelessly 20th c. real/fake dichotomy! The beauty was in how it's all simultaneously staged and "real".

Back in her high school-era Laguna Beach days, Kristin was being Kristin. Now, she's just doing a version of something akin to Heather Locklear's Melrose Place character. It's not the same.
[personal profile] karmageddon wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2009 08:07 pm (UTC)
Thanks for the Tiger Beatdown link, good stuff. I also found instinct infuriating, yet I'm curious enough to tune in next week.
crypto: Amy Pond (Default)
[personal profile] crypto wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2009 08:12 pm (UTC)
There's one episode whose premise made me want to check it out; I think it's the next one? *vague about spoilers*
anatsuno: Viggo Mortensen's handwriting on snow: one moonless night with a friend... (delicate and friendly)
[personal profile] anatsuno wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2009 09:20 pm (UTC)
Seconding this pretty much exactly. :)
torachan: (Default)
[personal profile] torachan wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2009 09:51 pm (UTC)
I am on the fence about Google Wave. When I saw the demo, I thought it looked neat, but at the same time, I was like, wow, that's way more fiddly than anything I need.

Also I don't really email that much, and most of the people I do email are not the type who are going to be using Google Wave, so it's probably pretty much a moot point for me anyway.

Have you watched Glee? I find it highly problematic, but am enjoying it all the same.
crypto: Amy Pond (Default)
[personal profile] crypto wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2009 10:05 pm (UTC)
For me, I don't IM much, and Google Wave seems to blur the distinction between email and IM, which doesn't necessarily feel like a good thing to me.

I haven't checked out Glee, mainly because my baseline interest in "show about a high school glee club" is basically zero. Then again, I'm not a football fan, but I love Friday Night Lights, so maybe I shouldn't be too hasty.
torachan: (Default)
[personal profile] torachan wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2009 10:06 pm (UTC)
It has lots of musical numbers! That's probably the best thing about it. XD
crypto: Amy Pond (Default)
[personal profile] crypto wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2009 10:12 pm (UTC)
But I hate musical numbers! ;)
thistleingrey: (Default)
[personal profile] thistleingrey wrote:
Oct. 7th, 2009 08:14 pm (UTC)
I can see GWave as a replacement for the chat-room meetings I run for half a dozen colleagues on an unaffiliated project. We've used Y!M and hated its visibility problems (two of "us" are very non-techy, almost allergic to answering my troubleshooting questions), and we like drop.io okay but it's not really meant for chat so much as "place to share semi-private files," which we don't need because I run a webhost space for us.... Uh, anyway. So I can see that something vaguely email-like with an interface reminiscent in some ways of Gmail would be suitable--but mostly for that niche use case. I think you're right that mail-on-steroids would be overwhelming in the general case; I'm not really looking forward to trying to use it myself.
crypto: Amy Pond (Default)
[personal profile] crypto wrote:
Oct. 7th, 2009 08:54 pm (UTC)
In my corner of the non-profit world, I'd love to have better collaboration and communication tools, but most of my colleagues are perennially behind the technology adoption curve when it comes to online tools. And I'm curious how the GWave interface would adapt to mobile devices, which seems pretty critical these days to widescale uptake.