The best of the FlowTV pieces -- and the one which speaks most immediately to my interests -- is People I Want to Know: Twitter, Celebrity and Social Connection by Liz Ellcessor, and Leigh Edwards' Twitter: Democratizing the Media Corporate Branding is also relevant (though I think there's supposed to be an 'or' in the title before 'Corporate Branding' and a question mark at the end). Still, it feels like they're only scraping the surface -- understandably, for short pieces on an emerging phenomenon.
Louisa Stein's It's Contagious: Twitter and the Palimpsest of Authorship juxtaposes Twitter with
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
lim 's vid Us, but I honestly couldn't figure out what her argument was -- something about "the prismatic processes of individual and collective authoring." Which sounds good, but the piece itself didn't make a lot of sense to me, and reads more like shorthand notes from a talk or an overgrown abstract for a longer and more thoroughly argued essay. Or am I just being dense?Off to 'follow' Lauren Conrad and Lil C....
Page Summary
Designed by chasethestars
chasethestars
Comments
(Sorry, did you think there was more to the argument than that? I could throw in some nice polysyllabic words, but I don't think that would make it more convincing.)
I am reminded, in the couple of weeks since I started using Facebook, that I am really not capable of short-form online communication. I need my complete sentences!
I haven't managed to sign in to Facebook in months. I just got a guilt-inducing email from them pointing out that I have all these friend requests that I haven't responded to yet. I think I have to sign in this weekend, because my supervisor just sent me a friend request and that's the kind of offer you can't refuse.
I don't know, I feel like if I used it more, I'd probably like it more, but it so far it feels like a trip to the dentist or the mall. Or maybe a mandatory office party with no alcohol in a dreary windowless conference room with flourescent lighting.
What she said. I don't want to be findable by random people I happened to have known at one time, tyvm.
Deeply creepy in some ways, FB, and socially coercive with it.
I suppose some might have a similar reaction to LJ's pseudonymity.
This may be a stretch, but FB does feel a bit like the online social networking version of national ID cards and surveillance databases.
Edited 2009-05-29 07:49 pm (UTC)
In case you haven't seen it, here's danah boyd's post about FB's attempt to dictate how people are (or, actually, aren't) supposed to use the platform. "Authentic usage only," dontcha know.
Ick. What makes these people think they're the boss of me? It's genuinely baffling.
Yeah, twitter, I dunno. I just followed Michael Rosenbaum, which I'm sure will end up obnoxiously hipster actor ironic frat boy cool or somesuch. I probably will unfollow in a couple of weeks...
I like reading my friends updates, though.? And Misha Collins has been very entertaining so far.
Welcometo the short new wrld! :)
I've seen Misha Collins' tweets. They scare me a bit -- I get weirded out by the constant direct address to fans. I think that's why I can't deal with the idea of following actors as real people, but I'm okay with following people whose TV careers are about being real people on reality shows. The latter come to Twitter already garbed in their established self-fashionings, but the people I'm used to seeing dressed up as fictional characters seem all too embarrassingly naked on Twitter.