Previous Entry | Next Entry

Audience empathy and dislike in Mad Men

  • Jul. 29th, 2010 at 2:16 PM
crypto: (sarah looks ahead)
Jason Mittell, "On Disliking Mad Men":

The missing ingredient from Draper and nearly all of Mad Men‘s characters is empathy, as virtually nobody’s behavior or situation invites me to place myself in their shoes. Instead, I watch the characters from an emotional remove that makes them appear as pieces in a mannered dance rather than fully realized people to care about. This might be the ultimate answer to the core appeal of serial drama, as without empathy toward the characters, viewers lack the emotional connection to sustain the commitment of weeks, months, and years that a successful series demands. Even though their actions are reprehensible, I feel empathy toward [Tony] Soprano, [Walter] White, [Dexter] Morgan, [Vic] Mackey, and [Al] Swearingen, understanding their acts in the context of their lives and situations. Draper’s blank slate doesn’t leave me with more than just the sense of him being a “cold bastard” as his core. And I translate this lack of empathy to how the show’s creators seem to regard their characters – while Al Swearingen might be a bastard, I always feel that creator David Milch loves the guy. While I know it’s my own projection rather than any authentic access to authorial intent, I can’t help but feel that Mad Men creator Matthew Weiner ultimately feels contempt toward Draper and the rest, fueling the emotional gap that keeps me from warming to the show.

In the end, watching Mad Men leaves me feeling unclean and unpleasant, having spent time in an unenjoyable place with people I don’t care about, and coming out smelling of stale cigarettes. The gloss and sheen is meant to charm me, but instead it masks something hollow, dark and cancerous. For people who like the show, this resonance is affecting and provocative, but for me, it feels like one of Don Draper’s callow ad pitches. None of the emotional arcs of the characters feel real or earned – instead I’m being sold the illusion of drama rather than honest drama itself, much like the packaging of nostalgia and memory in a Kodak slide projector. Enough people whom I respect feel quite differently, so I know it’s not because the show is a failure per se, but clearly there is a short circuit for me and presumably others, disengaging me from the show on its own terms and failing to create sufficient empathy to go along for the narrative ride that I want to enjoy....

It's funny; I was thinking this week, as I've been frantically marathoning season 3 of Mad Men to catch up and watch the current season as it airs, how odd it was to belatedly find myself empathizing with Don Draper. And yet I did, just as I've sporadically empathized with various other characters on the show at different times. But that empathic response isn't really the primary thing I seek out in television; especially with a self-consciously "quality" TV show like Mad Men, I'm looking for interestingness. I'm quite happy to get engaging characters with dilemmas and predicaments that I haven't experienced and can't relate to, leading lives that don't resemble mine (nor would I want them to). Those fleeting moments of recognition, identification, empathy -- if the characters are drawn and acted well enough, they'll inevitably come, but they're not necessarily the main event or precondition for my enjoyment.

Though I think I've been watching Mad Men as a modern tragedy crossed with more than a dash of A Doll's House, which might not ultimately turn out to be the best reading.

ETA: Ian Bogost, Against Aca-Fandom: On Jason Mittell on Mad Men

Tags:

Comments

crypto: Amy Pond (Default)
[personal profile] crypto wrote:
Jul. 29th, 2010 08:28 pm (UTC)
I think that's one of the big balancing acts of Mad Men - that oscillation between affection and contempt. Just when I'm feeling a sneaking fondness for Don or Roger or whomever, he'll say or do something appalling. It generally works for me -- keeping me from getting both too smug in my disdain, and too charmed or sympathetic.

I know what you mean about Don in season 3, though.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jul. 5th, 2014 12:56 pm (UTC)
vblyxnsn@gmail.com
Fantasy homeowners everywhere usually are kicking by themselves for completing over the Bucs wideout so they could earn the likes of Tyrone Calico plus Johnnie Morton. He's already been the waiverwire truck of the year. More desirable than Aaron Little.. The Huskies done 47 its first year beneath Edsall while even now playing as being a IAA school inside Atlantic 10, a year just after winning the actual conference, plus 38 its second. These people were 29 inside their first season in Department IA. I know the actual ACC is not the Southeastern Conference, or maybe the Big 12, but it's certainly not the Ocean 10.